Importance of Humility in learning Advaita

Posted on by
Reply

Advaita Siddhānta (doctrine) is about the Knowledge of the Self—the one and only “substance” that is eternally present, immutable, infinite, and complete, lacking nothing. It is no exaggeration to say that the most fundamental prerequisite for correctly understanding this millennia-old pinnacle of human thought known as Advaita Vedānta is humility.

Śaṅkara Bhagavatpāda beautifully summarizes the means to grasp Advaita Siddhānta in a single sentence in his commentary on Bhagavad Gītā 18.50. He adds that this is the very message conveyed by Śrī Kṛṣṇa in Bhagavad Gītā 2.69 and at several other places. He writes:

“It is only a cessation of the perception of the differentiated forms of the external world that can lead to a firm grasp of the real nature of the Self.”

Śaṅkara is equally careful to point out that Self-knowledge remains unattainable for those: Continue reading →

Upadesa Sahasri (Part 34)

Posted on by
Reply

Part 33


18.133–138                                                                                                              Advaita acknowledges six means of knowledge (pramana). They are perception, inference, comparison, postulation, non-cognition and testimony.  Does the Self require a pramana for its substantiation, like the non-Self? According to the opponent, a pramaṇa is required even though the Self is self-evident, and this would be so irrespective of whether ignorance is about the Self or something other than the Self.
Before responding, Sri Shankara analyses the meaning of the word ‘substantiation’ (siddhi). Does it mean ‘coming into existence’, ‘being known’, or something else?

Continue reading →

Quintessence of 10 Upanishads – 32 (aita 3)

Posted on by
3

[Part – 31 (aita 2)]

The aitareya Upanishad next presents a teaching story to unfold a profound philosophical truth.

It first describes the creation of the celestial deities, the presiding powers that govern the universe. Having brought forth the worlds, the Creator projected these deities, who then approached Him and said, in effect, “The world is our food, and we are its enjoyers. Where shall we abide to experience it?” The gods here represent the powers that function through the organs of perception and action.

ताभ्यो गामानयत्ता अब्रुवन्न वै नोऽयमलमिति । — mantra 1.2.2, aitareya upa.

[Meaning: For them He (i.e. the Creator God) brought a cow. They said, “This one is not certainly adequate for us.” ]

The Creator first produced the body of a cow and then that of a horse. The gods found neither suitable.  Continue reading →

jīvanmukti

Posted on by
Reply

The Reality of ‘Liberation While Living’

In the journey of Advaita Vedānta, the ultimate objective is often described as mokṣa—liberation from the cycle of birth and death (saṃsāra). For many seekers, however, there is a persistent question regarding the timing of this freedom: must one wait for the death of the physical body to be free, or is liberation possible here and now? Traditional Advaita answers this through the technical term jīvanmukti.

Derived from the Sanskrit roots jīvat (living) and mukti (liberation), jīvanmukti refers to the state of being ‘emancipated while still alive’. It is a concept that bridges the gap between the absolute reality of our nature and our transactional existence in the world. As we navigate the ‘minefield’ of modern spiritual teachings, understanding the nuances of jīvanmukti as defined by Ādi Śaṅkara is essential for clearing misconceptions about what happens to a person upon the dawn of Self-knowledge.

Continue reading →

Upadesa Sahasri (Part 33)

Posted on by
Reply

Part 32

Part 34

18.97–98
In the waking and dream states, there are experiences respectively of the external world and the internal world. This proves the existence of consciousness in these two states. In deep sleep, however, there is blankness. From this, one inference could be that consciousness does not exist during deep sleep. Another inference is that consciousness does exist, but there is nothing to experience.
In such a situation, when reason and experience are inconclusive, Sruti is the pramaṇa. Sruti (Br. Up. 4.3.9) discriminates between Consciousness (pure consciousness), the knowing principle, and mental modifications, that is, experiences. Consciousness is self-luminous, which means that its illuminating power never ceases (Br. Up. 4.3.23). In deep sleep, there is apparently no experience because the mind is dormant and there are no mental modifications to be illumined. As a result, there is the experience of nothingness which proves the existence of Consciousness.

Continue reading →

Quintessence of 10 Upanishads – 31 (aita 2)

Posted on by
3

[Part – 30 (aita 1)]

From the two facts that 

(i)   no percept (a perceivable object) can be known unless it is illumined by Knowingness; and, 

(ii)  all percepts are contained within Knowingness;

it follows that the known depends on Knowing and not the other way round. The seen depends upon the seer. The witnessing seer alone is the evidence for the existence of any object. Without a perceiver, there would be no experienced world. This is the meaning behind the Vedāntic statement that the world is mAyA or mithyA. Its appearance is called AbhAsa—a fallacious appearance.

The individual (jIva) too is of the same essential nature as Knowingness. The difference is only that the individual appears limited, whereas Knowingness is unlimited. The knower and the known, the individual and the world, are both appearances within the one Infinite Knowingness.

Why then do we fear the world?

Continue reading →

Āvaraṇa and Vikṣepa

Posted on by
Reply

The Twin Powers of Illusion

Most seekers of Advaita Vedānta eventually encounter a perplexing riddle: if Brahman is the only reality—one without a second—how is it that we perceive a world of dizzying multiplicity and feel ourselves to be limited, suffering individuals? Traditional teaching addresses this paradox through a sophisticated pedagogical framework known as the two ‘powers’ of ignorance (avidyā) or illusion (māyā): Āvaraṇa and Vikṣepa. While these terms are cornerstones of modern Advaitic study, they represent a nuanced evolution in the tradition that is vital for any serious student to understand.

Defining the Terms: Concealment and Projection

In the technical vocabulary of Vedānta, ignorance is not merely a passive lack of information; it is often described as a functional force with two distinct aspects.

Continue reading →

Upadesa Sahasri (Part 32)

Posted on by
Reply

Part 31

Part 33

18.79–87
In these verses, Sri Shankara refines the theory of reflection. In the teaching of Tat Tvam Asi (TTA), the word ‘Tvam’ directly refers to the ego and indirectly to the Self. This requires a relationship between the Self and the ego. The Samkhya system is unable to explain because it does not accept the theory of reflection. Consequently, a teaching imparted directly to the ego cannot be said to be imparted indirectly to the Self. In Advaita, however, reflection establishes the relationship. It is not a relationship of seer and seen because the Self is devoid of activity. Reflection, on the other hand, is formed merely by the presence of the Self. The opponent’s further argument that there is a relation of non-difference between the Self and the ego is also untenable because there is no knowledge in the form, “Consciousness is my real Self.”

Continue reading →

Quintessence of 10 Upanishads – 30 (aita 1)

Posted on by
Reply

[Part – 29 (taitti 4)]

8.  aitareya Upanishad:

The taittirIya Upanishad concludes with the ecstatic Vedic chant (sung by realized Sages) that “I am food; I am the eater of the food.” Here, “food” is not merely what is eaten from a plate. Whatever is consumed is food. The four elements—earth, water, fire, and air—are served to us on the vast platter of space. We consume them directly or in the countless forms they assume.

Our consumption is not merely through the mouth. The mind also feeds continuously. From birth until death it devours impressions, memories, relationships, possessions, emotions, hopes, fears, and ideas about this world and even other worlds. All these constitute food for the mind.

Thus, “food” in the mantra stands for the entire field of experience. The eater is the individual (jīva); the eaten is the world. In Vedāntic language, the eater is the knower and the food is the known. Everything cognized belongs to the world of names and forms.

The Upaniṣhad therefore ends by bringing together the knower and the known and declaring that both are included in “I.” Hence the sage proclaims, “I am the world and I am the individual.”

When both the individual and the world dissolve into “I,” no boundary remains between them. This naturally raises the crucial question: Who or what is this “I”?

Continue reading →

Upadesa Sahasri ( Part 31)

Posted on by
Reply

Part 30 

Part 32

18.72–75 are omitted, as they primarily deal with the Buddhist doctrine of momentary consciousness.
Who is the Hearer? Who Says, “I am Brahman”?
The teaching of Tat Tvam Asi (TTA) can serve its purpose only if there is a hearer to whom it is addressed (18.111). Accordingly, verses 18.76–77 raise the question: Who is the hearer of the teaching?
Two possible answers are examined: the Self and the ego. The Self cannot be the hearer being actionless and beyond all empirical transactions. Nor can the ego, who is a sufferer, be the hearer in the ultimate sense and truthfully declare, “I am free.” Does it imply that scripture is not a valid means of knowledge and the teaching is purposeless? To remove this confusion, verse 18.78 introduces the concept of reflected consciousness.

Continue reading →