[Part – 19 (muNDaka 2)]

Shankara writes:

ज्ञानप्रसादेन आत्मावबोधनसमर्थमपि स्वभावेन सर्वप्राणिनां ज्ञानं बाह्यविषयरागादिदोषकलुषितमप्रसन्नमशुद्धं सन्नावबोधयति नित्यसंनिहितमप्यात्मतत्त्वं मलावनद्धमिवादर्शम् ,  विलुलितमिव सलिलम्। 

तद्यदेन्द्रिय विषयसंसर्गजनितरागादिमलकालुष्यापनयनादादर्शसलिलादिवत्प्रसादितं स्वच्छं शान्तमवतिष्ठते, तदा ज्ञानस्य प्रसादः स्यात् । 

तेन ज्ञानप्रसादेन विशुद्धसत्त्वः विशुद्धान्तःकरणः योग्यो ब्रह्म द्रष्टुं यस्मात् , ततः तस्मात्तु तमात्मानं पश्यते पश्यति उपलभते निष्कलं सर्वावयवभेदवर्जितं ध्यायमानः सत्यादिसाधनवानुपसंहृतकरण एकाग्रेण मनसा ध्यायमानः चिन्तयन् ॥

[Meaning: The Grace of the Knowledge, though the intellect in all men is by nature competent to know brahman, still being polluted by such faults as love for external objects etc., thereby becoming unclear and impure, it does not, like a stained mirror and muddy water, grasp the entity of the Atman though always present nearby.

But when, through the removal of polluting taints such as desire—arising from contact with sense-objects—the intellect is made clear and calm like a mirror or still water, it becomes lucid. By this clarity of the intellect, the mind is purified, and the person becomes fit to realize brahman. Therefore, one sees brahman, which is partless, through contemplative meditation—having taken recourse to aids such as truth, having controlled the senses, and with a focused mind. (Translation adapted from S. Sitarama Sastri, 1905.)  Continue reading →

[Part – 18 (muNDaka 1)]

We can infer from 1.1.1 of the muNDaka Upaniṣad that Knowledge of the Self is not restricted to renunciates alone — it is imparted to householders as well. After all, Śaunaka himself was a householder, not a monk. What really matters is not one’s external status, but an inner readiness: the student must be free from preoccupation with worldly concerns and firmly resolved to realize the Self, without distraction.

शौनको ह वै महाशालोऽङ्गिरसं विधिवदुपसन्नः पप्रच्छ कस्मिन्नु भगवो विज्ञाते सर्वमिदं विज्ञातं भवतीति ॥    —   1.1.3, muNDaka upa.

[Meaning: Saunaka, well known as a great householder, having approached Angiras duly, asked, ‘O Adorable Sir, (which is that thing) which having been known, all this becomes known?’ (Translation: Swami Gambhirananda).]

Śaunaka is asking for that Knowledge, knowing which everything else becomes known. This is not just any question — it is the most fundamental inquiry possible. In fact, the Upaniṣads — especially those that follow the muNDaka — can be seen as extended responses to this very question. The teacher appreciates the depth of the inquiry but also makes it clear that the student must have the steadiness to abide in what is taught. Continue reading →

[Part – 17 (prashna 4)]

muNDaka Upanishad 

The Self is of the nature of pure sentience. Hence, it can be known only through that which is likewise sentient—namely, an entity belonging to the same genre. By way of illustration, a magnet attracts iron filings but not a piece of wood; for attraction is possible only between entities that share a common nature.

The body, the senses, and even the vital force (prANa), being insentient, are incapable of apprehending the Self. The mind (antaḥkaraNa) alone, being endowed with reflected consciousness and possessing the capacity for cognition, serves as the appropriate instrument for the knowledge of the Self. Therefore, the mind alone is competent to grasp It.

Further, the Self that is sought to be realized is utterly indivisible and without any internal distinctions. It is free from all forms of differentiation — whether internal, external, or relational.

A tree, though seemingly a single entity, is divisible into multiple constituent parts such as roots, trunk, branches, leaves, flowers, fruits, and seeds. It is thus a “divisible whole.” Space, on the other hand, is not subject to such division and may be regarded as an “indivisible whole.” The Self is akin to the latter.  

Continue reading →